Effective technology to eliminate competitors
One of the main questions of all businessmen is how to eliminate a competitor. Making a competitor leave the market is the dream of every businessman. Eliminating a competitor once and for all is the most cherished dream of any businessman. This can be done, and quite easily. It does not matter whether a strong competitor or weak, big or small.
How to eliminate a competitor without consequences
You can make sure that any competitor leaves any market. A competitor will leave without a fight, in other words, you will not even have to fight him and spend money on it. Under certain conditions, he will leave himself, you just need to create these conditions for him. As a rule, the competitor will leave quickly enough and will offer the winner his assets as a reward.
How to eliminate a competitor is known only to initiates who are familiar with noomarketing or similar technologies. Classical marketing is not enough to organize a situation in which a competitor simply will not have another choice. Classic marketing – it is to meet the needs and requirements, and not to fight competitors.
Companies that own marketing or similar technologies exist. For example, a couple of years ago, a shameful flight from a market of more than 30 billion US dollars of one very serious player took place. The player is really very serious, because the cumulative sales of more than 220 billion US dollars.
This, as many have guessed, is about Samsung
Sales directly in the market from which this player left, reach 3 billion US dollars. If it was some kind of newcomer, that’s okay, but when this is far from new, when this company is known all over the world, the capitalization of which exceeds $ 350 billion, then this flight can even be called a great shame.
This, as many have guessed, is about Samsung, which announced it is leaving the hard drive market and selling its business to the market leader, Seagate. To realize such a shameful escape of one of the leaders from such a “tasty” market could only be a company that owns not only classical marketing, but some special marketing,
Seagate clearly owns marketing in which there are techniques that answer the question of how to eliminate a competitor, a very strong competitor. According to official data, Samsung has left the market due to the fact that it has become unprofitable for it, and also because the production of hard drives does not belong to the strategic sphere.
This can be believed because everything looks quite logical, but in principle, it is hard to believe, because this company is represented in the market of many devices that use hard drives, in particular in the notebook market. Having a better hard drive than other companies can seriously affect the competitiveness of a laptop,
Accordingly, whatever one may say, but still this is a strategic sphere. However, now, after the sale of this unit, Samsung, most likely, will not be able to get and realize this advantage. Accordingly, there must be another reason, more weighty. It is there and it can only be revealed through noomarketing or other similar concepts.
Of noomarketing it is known that the idea is the basis of the market. Any market is first of all an idea. It takes root in people and turns them into consumers. The aggregate of carriers of a particular idea is the market. In our case, this is the idea of “accumulating information on a computer”, but this is a basic idea that originated at the dawn of this market.
Now she has changed and developed. Formed a few new ideas. In particular, the most significant was the idea, which sounds like “reliable, durable, inexpensive and silent accumulation of information on a computer.” It is Seagate that makes hard drives that best fit this idea,
This suggests that Seagate is known for including an effective market expansion strategy and is using it. The bottom line is that the market on the basis of this idea is growing, while the market on the basis of the initial idea of “accumulating information on a computer” is narrowing. It was in this market that Samsung was represented, which began to experience problems.
We see the Samsung leadership understood the perspectives of its company in this market and decided to leave it, because soon there would be no trace of him, and therefore the assets would have depreciated. The reason for this state of affairs, when the world leader in many areas is forced to leave the market, a large enough market and strategically important to it, is quite commonplace.